Benchmarks
This page compares throughput under a controlled workload and documents the versions, environment, and measurement conditions.
🧭 How the comparison was run
Section titled “🧭 How the comparison was run”- Versions. Pingclair
v0.2.0-rc.3, measured from that release candidate’s binary, nginx 1.31.6, and Caddy 2.11.4. Later patch releases are not re-measured. - Host. One Apple M2 laptop running OrbStack.
- Limits. Every server runs in a container capped at two CPUs, with the same worker count and the same 1 KiB payload.
- Topology. The reverse-proxy backend runs in its own container on the same Docker network.
- Load generator. HTTP/1.1, HTTPS/1.1, and HTTP/2 use a native
h2load. HTTP/3 uses an ngtcp2-enabledh2loadinside the same Docker network.
📊 Results
Section titled “📊 Results”Each value is requests per second: the median of three interleaved rounds of 50,000 requests. A row counts only when every request succeeded.
| Scenario | Pingclair | nginx 1.31.6 | Caddy 2.11.4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| HTTP/1.1 static | 46,125 | 39,478 | 18,266 |
| HTTPS/1.1 static | 40,721 | 31,508 | 19,978 |
| HTTP/2 static | 92,369 | 41,972 | 17,424 |
| HTTP/3 static | 56,180 | 55,638 | 22,912 |
| HTTP/1.1 reverse proxy | 20,856 | 22,584 | 17,117 |
| HTTPS/1.1 reverse proxy | 20,297 | 21,944 | 16,660 |
| HTTP/2 reverse proxy | 23,181 | 20,396 | not completed |
| HTTP/3 reverse proxy | 28,078 | 22,213 | not completed |
Against nginx, Pingclair has higher throughput in the HTTP/1.1, HTTPS/1.1, and HTTP/2 static rows (1.2x, 1.3x, and 2.2x respectively), while HTTP/3 static throughput is approximately equal. On the reverse-proxy workload it is 14% ahead on HTTP/2 and 26% ahead on HTTP/3, while HTTP/1.1 and HTTPS/1.1 remain about 8% behind nginx.
📐 Conditions that limit these numbers
Section titled “📐 Conditions that limit these numbers”- The host is a laptop. Absolute throughput is not a capacity claim, and the ratios describe relative performance under this controlled workload only.
- Compare within a row. The HTTP/3 load generator runs in a different environment from the others, so absolute throughput should not be compared across protocols, only between servers within a row.
- Incomplete rows are not comparisons. On this host and harness, Caddy did not complete the proxied HTTP/2 and HTTP/3 rows: upstream connection churn exhausted the container’s available ephemeral ports at the tested concurrency. Those cells are reported as incomplete rather than measured under a different workload.
- The results are host-dependent. The relative position of the servers changes with CPU architecture, kernel, worker count, and TLS implementation.
🧾 Source
Section titled “🧾 Source”The numbers come from one run of the server repository’s benchmark harness. The methodology, the rules a run must meet before a number counts, and the harness are published there:
Raw per-run evidence stays in the maintainer’s checkout and is not published.
